🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have voted to withdraw from an global treaty designed to protect women from violence, covering domestic abuse, following prolonged and intense discussions in the parliament.

Thousands of protesters gathered in Riga this past week to oppose the vote. The final authority now rests with Head of State the nation's president, who must determine whether to endorse or veto the legislation.

Referred to as the European treaty, the international accord only took effect in Latvia last twelve months ago, mandating governments to establish laws and assistance programs to end all types of violence.

Latvia has become the initial EU country to initiate the procedure of withdrawing from the treaty. The transcontinental nation pulled out in two years ago, a decision that human rights organizations characterized as a significant regression for women's rights.

Ideological Controversy and Resistance

The treaty was approved by the European Union in 2023, yet conservative groups have contended that its emphasis on equal rights weakens family values and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers voted by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the treaty, a move sponsored by political opponents but supported by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a defeat for centre-right Prime Minister Evika Silina, who joined demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse will not prevail," she declared to the crowd.

Ideological Disagreements and Responses

One of the main parties advocating for the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose head has called on citizens to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

Latvia's ombudswoman Karina Palkova urged the agreement not to be made political, while the group the rights organization stated it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it served as a tool to realize them".

The Thursday's decision has provoked broad outcry both within Latvia and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand people have endorsed a Latvian petition calling for the treaty to be maintained. The gender equality group the rights center has announced a protest for next Thursday, accusing lawmakers of disregarding the wishes of the Latvian people.

Global Worries and Potential Future Actions

The head of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly commented that Latvia had made a rash decision driven by misinformation. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying step backward for female equality and human rights in Europe".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation left the treaty in 2021, cases of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not achieve a supermajority majority, the head of state could possibly return the legislation for additional consideration if he holds concerns.

Head of State Rinkevics announced on digital platforms that he would evaluate the vote according to legal principles, "taking into account governmental and judicial factors, rather than ideological or political viewpoints".

Last week, another member of the governing alliance, the Progressives, indicated it would not exclude appealing to the supreme judicial body.

"This decision represents a worrisome development for gender equality not only in Latvia but across the continent," stated a rights activist.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been increasing in several European nations
• The Istanbul Convention mandates specific safeguards for victims of gender-based violence
• The nation's vote could affect comparable discussions in other member states