🔗 Share this article

Throughout the beginning sections of the book Authentic, writer Burey raises a critical point: typical injunctions to “be yourself” or “show up completely genuine at work” are not harmless encouragements for personal expression – they’re traps. This initial publication – a mix of recollections, research, cultural commentary and interviews – attempts to expose how organizations appropriate personal identity, shifting the burden of corporate reform on to individual workers who are already vulnerable.

Personal Journey and Larger Setting

The driving force for the work originates in part in the author’s professional path: multiple jobs across business retail, emerging businesses and in international development, filtered through her background as a woman of color with a disability. The two-fold position that Burey faces – a back-and-forth between asserting oneself and seeking protection – is the engine of Authentic.

It arrives at a time of widespread exhaustion with corporate clichés across America and other regions, as resistance to diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs increase, and many organizations are reducing the very frameworks that once promised transformation and improvement. The author steps into that landscape to contend that retreating from corporate authenticity talk – specifically, the organizational speech that reduces individuality as a grouping of surface traits, quirks and pastimes, keeping workers focused on handling how they are seen rather than how they are treated – is not the answer; instead, we need to reinterpret it on our personal terms.

Minority Staff and the Act of Persona

By means of vivid anecdotes and conversations, Burey illustrates how marginalized workers – employees from diverse backgrounds, members of the LGBTQ+ community, women, disabled individuals – soon understand to adjust which persona will “pass”. A weakness becomes a drawback and people overcompensate by striving to seem palatable. The effort of “presenting your true self” becomes a projection screen on which numerous kinds of assumptions are placed: affective duties, revealing details and continuous act of thankfulness. According to Burey, we are asked to reveal ourselves – but lacking the defenses or the reliance to endure what emerges.

According to the author, workers are told to reveal ourselves – but without the safeguards or the trust to withstand what arises.’

Illustrative Story: Jason’s Experience

The author shows this phenomenon through the narrative of Jason, a employee with hearing loss who took it upon himself to teach his team members about the culture of the deaf community and communication norms. His eagerness to talk about his life – a behavior of candor the organization often praises as “genuineness” – briefly made everyday communications smoother. But as Burey shows, that advancement was precarious. Once employee changes eliminated the informal knowledge the employee had developed, the environment of accessibility dissolved with it. “Everything he taught left with them,” he states tiredly. What was left was the fatigue of being forced to restart, of having to take charge for an organization’s educational process. According to Burey, this is what it means to be told to share personally without protection: to face exposure in a system that applauds your transparency but refuses to codify it into policy. Authenticity becomes a trap when institutions count on individual self-disclosure rather than institutional answerability.

Literary Method and Concept of Dissent

The author’s prose is both clear and poetic. She marries intellectual rigor with a style of connection: a call for followers to participate, to question, to oppose. According to the author, workplace opposition is not noisy protest but ethical rejection – the effort of opposing uniformity in environments that demand gratitude for basic acceptance. To resist, according to her view, is to interrogate the stories institutions describe about justice and belonging, and to decline participation in rituals that maintain unfairness. It may appear as calling out discrimination in a discussion, withdrawing of voluntary “inclusion” effort, or defining borders around how much of oneself is offered to the company. Resistance, the author proposes, is an assertion of self-respect in spaces that typically reward conformity. It is a practice of integrity rather than defiance, a method of maintaining that an individual’s worth is not conditional on institutional approval.

Reclaiming Authenticity

The author also avoids inflexible opposites. Authentic avoids just eliminate “sincerity” completely: instead, she urges its restoration. In Burey’s view, sincerity is not the unfiltered performance of individuality that organizational atmosphere typically applauds, but a more intentional harmony between individual principles and one’s actions – an integrity that resists manipulation by organizational requirements. Instead of considering sincerity as a requirement to overshare or adapt to cleansed standards of openness, Burey advises followers to keep the aspects of it grounded in honesty, self-awareness and principled vision. In her view, the goal is not to discard authenticity but to shift it – to move it out of the corporate display practices and into relationships and organizations where trust, justice and answerability make {