🔗 Share this article

For a two-week interval at the end of August, the severe immigration detention center in the Florida Everglades, known as "Alligator Alcatraz," looked to be closed. This facility had gained infamy for allegations of abusive practices and legal rights breaches.

A federal judge had determined that its swift construction in the protected wetlands breached federal ecological regulations. State officials seemed to be complying with the shutdown directive by transferring hundreds of inmates and reducing operations.

To various commentators, the operation of the grim tented camp seemed to have been a troubling but brief episode in the ongoing cruelty of the wider immigration enforcement under the current administration, which has divided families and detained thousands with no prior offenses.

Judicial Panel Steps In, Halting Shutdown

Then, two federal justices selected by the previous administration took action. One of the judges has a husband with close ties to the GOP governor of Florida, Ron DeSantis. Their order to halt the district court's directive not only enabled DeSantis to maintain Alligator Alcatraz running, but it also seems to have intensified functions at his key immigration facility.

“It’s returned into action,” said a official of advocacy at an non-profit organization that has arranged vigils attended by many activists at the camp every end of the week since it started in early July.

Immigration activists who have sustained a near constant presence at the entrance state they have witnessed numerous buses coming and going as the large camp once again reaches capacity; lawyers for some of the detainees say that authorities are escalating efforts to limit access to their detainees.

Findings of Disappeared Individuals

Local media reported that hundreds of the captives held at Alligator Alcatraz, out of an reported 1,800 held there in July before the judicial actions, had since “dropped off the grid.”

This indicates the site has again become a central point of a secretive operation that transfers inmates around the country to different immigration facilities in a kind of “legal void,” or simply removes them without information to representatives or relatives.

“Now it’s back open, this poorly run state-run facility is essentially operating like a covert detention center, people are being lost, and the abuse and chaos is intentional,” stated the director.

Legal Challenges and Environmental Concerns

The Everglades camp, which was built in eight days in June on a primarily unused airstrip 40 miles west of Miami, is the target of numerous legal actions filed by organizations seeking its closure. The initial judicial ruling was issued in an action filed by the native community and an alliance of environmental groups.

The court sided with their arguments that large areas of newly paved roads, installation of large sections of perimeter fencing, and after-dark illumination visible for miles was damaging to the protected land.

The judicial review board, however, determined in a majority opinion that because the state had originally used its own money (an reported $450 million) to build it, it could not be considered a US government project and therefore no conservation assessment was required.

On Thursday, it was reported that Florida received a significant amount reimbursement from the FEMA for Alligator Alcatraz and related immigration-related projects.

“This seems to be the definitive proof showing that our case is entirely correct,” stated the state leader at the Center for Biological Diversity. “This is a national program built with taxpayer dollars that’s required by federal law to go through a thorough impact study. The government can’t keep deceiving blatantly to the people at the detriment of Florida’s endangered wildlife.”

Individual Treatment and Attorney Meetings

More information into the reopening of Alligator Alcatraz came last week in a different lawsuit in Florida’s federal court, filed on behalf of inmates who assert they are being denied visits with their immigration attorneys in violation of their legal entitlements.

Federal officials mandate three business days’ notice to set up a face-to-face meeting, a condition “much tighter than at different immigration facilities,” the filing claims, adding that lawyers often show up to find their clients have been relocated elsewhere “immediately prior to the planned meetings.”

“Some inmates never have the chance to meet with their attorneys,” it said.

In accounts shared, the relative of one unauthorized Alligator Alcatraz individual, who did not want to be identified for fear of retaliation, said she was allowed to speak to him only in limited phone calls that were monitored.

“They are being dealt with like the most dangerous. They are handled brutally and have been put in confinements like animals,” she said. “They are restrained by their hands and their ankles, they bathe every three days with shared garments they all share, and I can’t even imagine the quality and portion of the food they are given. They can’t even tell what time of day it is. Convicted offenders are receiving better treatment than the humans held in this place.”

Official Position

A spokesperson for the homeland security department disputed any abuse of individuals in a statement that asserted all claims to the contrary were “fabrications.”

“Alligator Alcatraz does comply with national guidelines,” she said.

In additional comments last month following reports of due process violations, formerly unknown accounts of neglect, and documented health emergencies, the official said: “Any allegation that there are poor treatment at immigration detention centers are false. Immigration authorities has stricter care requirements than most US prisons that hold legal residents.

“All detainees are given adequate meals, medical treatment, and have means to communicate with lawyers and their loved ones.”

Organizer Outlook

The executive director of a rights group said the revival of Alligator Alcatraz followed a trend.

“We’ve seen it in the past of not only DeSantis, but also the national government. They begin something, they make missteps, we win [in court], then they come back harder and stronger,” she said. “Now they are more empowered and authorized to just do what they’re doing, because it feels like they have more of the federal government support. So there’s no more guilt in doing the unethical act, no more shame in losing detainees.”

The advocate added that the camp’s comeback had effectively suppressed {dissent|protest